ABSTRACT
Objective:To construct a scientific research evaluation model through principal component analysis, and to explore scientific research evaluation methods for hospitals.Methods:The professional title, educational background, positions and scientific research output information of the scientific research personnel in the First Hospital of Jilin University from 2019 to 2020 were collected. Delphi expert consultation was used to determine the assignment value of each variable, and use SPSS 21.0 software was used to build the principal component analysis model and conduct model verification.Results:The study collected a total of 1 882 researchers′ information. The KMO value of the validity test and the Bartlett sphere test meet the requirements of principal component analysis (KMO=0.731, P<0.05); the model obtained a total of 7 principal components. Among them, principal component 1 represents researchers who published SCI papers, applying for national, provincial and ministerial level scientific research projects, and their part-time positions in academic societies. The second principal component represents the status of applying for patents and publications, and the third principal component represents the status of the awards. The scores of scientific research output of researchers were summarized and sorted according to disciplines, according to which the neurology, endocrinology and metabolism, neurosurgery, general surgery and orthopedics ranked better. The model verification results found that researchers with senior professional titles and doctoral degrees had the highest median weighted comprehensive score( P<0.05), suggesting that scholars with higher professional title levels and higher education received higher comprehensive scientific research output scores. Conclusions:The scientific research evaluation model constructed by this study can provide scientific data reference for the hospital scientific research evaluation.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To understand the development trend of scientific research in major medical institutions in China from 2019 to 2021.Methods:The PubMedplus database was searched, and the distribution of papers, published journals and its′ influencing factors (IF) of top 30 domestic medical institutions from 2019 to 2021 were statistically analyzed.Results:From 2019 to 2021, 84 405 PubMed papers were published by the top 30 medical institutions, including 79 459 papers in English, accounted for 94.14%, and 4 946 papers in Chinese, accounted for 5.86%. Of them, 22 447, 29 540 and 32 430 papers were published in 2019, 2020 and 2021. 75 240 papers in English were indexed by SCI database (89.14% of total English papers). 17 729 papers (accounted for 21.00%) were published by the top 27 journals, Frontier in Oncology ranks first. 4 400 papers (5.85% of total) were published by the journals of impact factors greater than 10. The biggest portion of the papers, 26 550 papers (35.29% of total) were published by the journals of impactor factor from 3 to 5. Conclusions:The quantity and quality of papers published by major medical institutions in China have been greatly improved each year. The progress level of medical institutions is different, and their advantageous disciplines of medical institutions have been well reflected.
ABSTRACT
Objective Through the comparative analysis of the scientific research performance among different dental institutions,to understand the current situation of scientific research development at Peking University School of Stomatology,identify the advantages and disadvantages.Methods Using Scopus and Scival tools,five dental institutes at home and abroad were selected as the target institutions,parallel comparison of the research output,research influence and research development were conducted and analyzed.Results The research output of Peking University School of Stomatology and West China School of Stomatology is absolutely dominant.Peking University School of Stomatology is at a disadvantage in terms of research impact and development indicators such as Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI),Outputs in Top10 ％ Citation Percentiles,Citation per Publication,and International Collaboration.In the distribution of dentistry,there is a big gap between Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) of different institutions.Conclusions The research strength of Peking University School of Stomatology is weak either in the whole or in the subdivision of dentistry,based on this,further measures and suggestions are put forward to provide reference for scientific development strategies.
ABSTRACT
The training of clinical theory and scientific research thinking is very important for postgraduates of neurology,however,of which,problems are existing,such as the low level of scientific research and the imperfect system.Based on the experience of postgraduate training in the hospital,the authors put forward some improving measures,specifically,to arouse the interest of scientific research,to build the scope of scientific research,to improve the comprehensive strength of personal scientific research,to establish the guarantee mechanism of scientific research and to perfect the system of graduation evaluation.Practice shows that these measures has promoted the enthusiasm and subjective initiative of neuroscience academic postgraduates for scientific research,improved the quality of postgraduate education,and formed a certain basic and clinical research output.
ABSTRACT
The rationality of hormonal calculating method for the precedence of signed authors and the total num-ber of coauthors was elaborated according to the analysis of different allocation methods for the credit weight of coau-thors. It was proposed that the credit weight calculating method of co-first authors, corresponding author and co-corresponding authors should be used as a supplement of hormonal calculating method, and the published papers and their citation frequency should be weighted in order to provide the ideas for revising the present scientific re-search evaluation methods.
ABSTRACT
Objective To understand the scientific research competitive power in clinical medicine and the role of F1000 in assessment of scientific research competitive power in the top 10 colleges and universities in China . Methods F1000-covered papers on clinical medicine published by the top 10 colleges and universities in China from 2005 to 2014 were retrieved.A database was established using Excel and analyzed by SPSS 20.0.Results The number of F1000-covered papers increased significantly although the scientific achievements needed to be fur-ther recognized in the world.Conclusion The scientific research competitive power in colleges and universities can be effectively assessed in different aspects.The F1000-covered data are very convincing due to its strict operational mechanisms .
ABSTRACT
〔Abstract〕 By literature investigation , the paper describes the current research status of the relevance between the international co -author mode and paper citation , including characteristics of current researches on the analysis level , subject and method , etc.In combi-nation with the current research status and requirements of scientific research evaluation , it provides suggestions for the conduction of re-search activities in this field .
ABSTRACT
After the indexes of article count, fraction count, weighted fraction count, and domestic and interna-tional collaboration ratio were calculated using the 2014 nature index of life science issued by British Nature Pub-lishing Group as the data source, the 2014 scientific research outputs in life science of some domestic colleges and universities were analyzed with certain suggestions put forward for reducing the gap in scientific research strength between China and USA.
ABSTRACT
Scientific research to a great extent,represents the comprehensive strength of a unit,directly determine the development prospects of this unit.At present,our country many medical institutions of scientific research strength is low,potential is insufficient,can't meet the development of medical institutions.This study from the aspects of management performance,to evaluate scientific research ability from various perspectives,statistical analysis of its influencing factors at the same time,Reflects the technical level of this unit,discipline construction,scientific research and development and performance,produced by scientific management for the unit provides an objective basis for scientific research management departments to formulate relevant policies to explore to improve the new management starting point,thus achieve the goal of science and technology.